How To Live Longer

On average, most mammals tend to live to approximately one billion heartbeats. According to the North Coast Journal, the larger the animal, the slower the heartbeat. This has an inversely proportional effect on the longevity of the animal. The smaller the mammal, the faster its heart beats and the faster it will die. A mouse, which is much smaller than a cat, has a much higher heart rate than that of a cat. And as such, mice tend to live shorter lives than cats. This theory, which biologists call the ‘quarter power scaling rule,’ illustrates that on average, most mammals tend to live to approximately one billion heartbeats.

one-billion-heartbeats

However, humans are one of the few mammals who are an anomaly in this statistic. If humans were to prescribe to the one billion heartbeat rule then humans would only live to about 35 years old. Humans nowadays can live up to three times that amount, not trying to jinx it for all of us, and this is a result of increased medical technology, hygiene and our environment among many other factors. But what are some ways of increasing our longevity or possibly finding that elixir to immortality?

The Jackson Laboratory conducted research on mice where they limited the amount of calories the mice could ingest and found a correlation between a reduced caloric intake and an increased lifespan. The researchers deduced that reducing the overall amount of food that the mice ingested allowed them to live longer.  Gary Churchill, who is one of the professors at the Jackson Lab, said that mice typically live for around two years but after putting them on a calorie-restrictive diet he found that some of the mice could live up to five years long! However, he did make an effort to state: ‘while it is clear that some animal models, like the inbred C57BL6/J mouse strain, benefit from caloric restriction, there is also evidence that the effects can differ depending on the genetic makeup of the animal. The same will likely be true for people: Caloric restriction may be a good thing for one person and not for another. Until we understand these individual differences, we have to be very cautious about recommending dietary changes for people.’

36_mice_wide

A PubMed article which looked at the effects of caloric intake and aging found that ‘the people in the group with the lowest body-mass index (less than 19.0 for women53 and less than 22.5 for men52) had about a 20 percent lower risk of death than those in the group with the next higher body-mass index.’ While this study was conducted on obese people it should come as no surprise that a reduced amount of food for the obese person will do wonders for their health (duh!) But a study which was conducted on non-obese men from the Netherlands found that a 20 per cent reduction in total caloric intake over ten weeks resulted in an improvement in a host of health factors (reductions in diastolic and systolic blood pressure, increases in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations,58 reductions in serum triiodothyronine concentrations and the metabolic rate,59 and beneficial effects on fibrinolytic factors.’ So while there are health benefits in reducing food in obese people, the same health factors apply to non-obese people as well.

In another PubMed article, it was concluded that ‘both reduced calories intake and the ratio between macro nutrients, namely the protein to carbohydrates ratio, positively impact lifespan.’ The same article went on to say that a reduced protein intake (between 10 to 30 per cent of total calories) results in a lower risk of mortality. A CNN article showed that cutting calories by 15 per cent for two years led to the slowing of a metabolic process that is involved in aging. The article which was based on research done by the journal called Cell Metabolism revealed that the decreased metabolic rate resulted in a lowered rate of oxidative stress which is known to be ‘tied to diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and other age-related conditions.’

screen-shot-2018-09-05-at-17-04-13-1024x536

So while correlation does not equal causation, more and more studies are coming forth that show a correlation and a causation between a reduced caloric intake and an increased lifespan. While more studies need to be conducted on the types of calories that should be reduced, and the optimal ratio of carbs, fats and proteins that increase longevity, it is pretty clear that reducing food in a Westernized diet should do wonders for our overall health. So what can help you live longer? Eating less food.

 

Advertisements

John Patterson

John Patterson was a 33 year veteran of the communications technology industry and it was back in July 14 of 2007 when he decided to turn against said industry and go on a rampage that would wreak enough havoc to land him in jail for almost two years. John was a senior technical officer at Telstra and Telstra is self described (on their website) as ‘Australia’s leading provider of mobile phones, mobile devices, home phones and broadband internet.’

download

According to EMR Australia, John Patterson was one of Australia’s ‘leading radiation experts’ and as a telecommunications engineer he was the one who would troubleshoot problems and stay informed on the newest technologies and gadgets. In an interview with Wake Up World, John revealed that electromagnetic radiation is a lot more dangerous than what we know. The article went on to state that when John moved to a new office in between two cell phone towers he began to feel sick. He then tested the electromagnetic radiation in the vicinity and determined that it was an occupational hazard.  The level he noticed indicated that the ‘installation should be shut down immediately,’ but when John notified his superiors of his findings he was fired instead of rewarded. John said: ‘[the report] showed that it was an occupational hazard to work in that building with that amount of radiation. I was immediately removed from service.’

When all other avenues failed to provide justice to John for his righteous work he decided to take things into his own hands. In a report from the Daily Telegraph, John stole a one million dollar ex-British army tank from a former employer named A-One Lift Truck Services and began smashing the tank into a wide variety of cell towers.

News.com.au reported that a ‘1967 Trojan armoured personnel carrier’ had been stolen and that the ex-British Army tank was used to demolish a number of cell towers. In total more than six mobile phone towers were destroyed and more than 20 police cars chased after the tank. Eventually John’s rampage ended at around 4am the next morning when the tank stalled as he was about to destroy a seventh cell tower.

download (3)

The owner of A One Lift Truck Service, Greg Morris, said: ‘he used to work for Telstra and told us he was going through a medical claim for his head injury. He said something about the radiation from the towers had caused it He actually worked on the tank he stole, doing a lot of wiring and putting the engine in.’

So during a time where no one said anything about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation, John Patterson risked his life, job and financial security to publicize the dangers of radiation. He spoke out about a great danger that could possibly affect us all. In the interview with Wake Up World, John said: ‘everyone said that I was technically correct, but no one had the power to stand up. People within the industry, they’ve just misinformed all of the relevant authorities.’

While John regrets going on the rampage, he said: ‘I wasn’t thinking clearly, I made some rash decisions which I really regret,’ he now focuses his attention on raising awareness to the dangers of radiation. He is one of the few brave people to stand up against convention to say what is right. Millenials are the first batch of people to go through an entire lifetime using technology, wi-fi and all its wireless benefits and as such there is no research or study that has been conducted over a lifetime of radiation exposure.

EMRAustralia has some great tips on how to reduce radiation exposure:

  • Minimize the use of mobile phones in buses and trains in peak hour.
  • Avoid closed rooms with mobile phones.
  • If you use a mobile phone in the car, wind all the windows down—(‘For a mobile phone signal to go through 3 mm of glass it has to double its power.’) Tinted glass is less permeable to mobile phone signals again, causing the phone to increase power.
  • ‘Pregnant women definitely should not use mobile phones. The foetus absorbs the radiation that its mother absorbs.
  • Don’t send SMS messages as the mobile phone transmits at maximum power for this.
  • Don’t use mobile phones inside bobcats and vibrating industrial machines
  • Industry should double-check the work of its employees because momentary memory lapses affect productivity and pose a liability risk.